Teaching Word, PowerPoint, and Excel should be criminal!
So I got the last post of 2006. I figured I might as well get your attention to start 2007.
Yes, it should be illegal to teach productivity software and count that as technology instruction. That is, at least, what Nicholas Negroponte thinks. You see, Negroponte is the man with the plan for distributing laptops to children around the world. His initiative has already begun to distribute the machines. Originally they were expected to cost $100 each, but the final cost for those initially shipping is around $150. Still, this is a great price for a laptop affectionately (no pun intended) known now as XO (pictured above).
XO can communicate with other XO’s around it via its wireless capabilities. Students can share files between systems due to this ability as well as video conference and chat with the built-in cameras. What is unique is that the machine contains no hard drive. While it does have 512 meg of flash memory, it sports USB 2.0 ports to allow the use of flash drives for nearly unlimited storage capacity. Another unique aspect is the hand crank to energize the power for it. This will be a great benefit in remote regions where power is not common place. The Linux-based machine (nope, no Windows here) uses a journal to help the user organize files instead of folders. It is believed that the journal will allow the user to remember why the file was in use (note the forced thinking skill here). According to CNN’s article, Negroponte says several million XO’s are expected to reach Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Nigeria, Libya, Pakistan, Thailand, and the Palestinian territory.
So how does that tie in to the crime of teaching productivity software? Negroponte shares this vision in a recent CNN article:
"In fact, one of the saddest but most common conditions in elementary school computer labs (when they exist in the developing world), is the children are being trained to use Word, Excel and PowerPoint," Negroponte wrote in an e-mail interview. "I consider that criminal, because children should be making things, communicating, exploring, sharing, not running office automation tools." (emphasis mine)
Wow! What a concept! Who would have guessed .... Wait a minute. Making products, communicating, sharing, exploring. That sure sounds familiar. That is part of the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology. Hmmm. If Negroponte can do that with his $150 laptops, imagine what we can do with our $1200 desktops with T1 Internet access and unlimited software access, not to mention all of the FREE Web 2.0 tools out there (such as wikis, blogs, podcasting software, etc). Oh, and don’t forget we have electricity so our students do not have to stop to crank their power back up. Imagine the possibilities.
Credits: photo courtesy of www.laptop.org
powered by performancing firefox
5 Comments:
At 1/01/2007 9:27 PM, Pete Smith said…
I read that article on CNN and had the same reaction, especially that line about teaching productivity software!
While I laud the effort in general, I wonder: Web 2.0 is essentially bringing us a connected view of the net and net pedagogy (re: my comments about connectivism last Summer)...how then do devices that are not oftentimes not "connected" stack up?
At 1/02/2007 10:36 PM, Scott S. Floyd said…
I would say that it would at least begin a lot of creativity within the subgroups using them. If they are being asked to be productive, I could see them raising the question about what they really need to be productive. I am sure they will have access to Linux based/compatible versions of productivity software anyway.
I remember reading somewhere many months ago that the One Laptop group expects the presence of the laptops to spur on global expansion of Internet access. While I am excited about that idea, I wonder how it can occur when I cannot even get high-speed while living just 4 miles out of town (albeit a town of 6000). Sigh. It is all about money.
My true interest in all of this is to see how well the roll out goes for an inexpensive system that could change the way we at least teach/integrate technology in elementary grades. I would not expect Texas to invest in anything this major without a lot of research or political clout to back it up.
At 1/03/2007 9:34 AM, Scott S. Floyd said…
Pete and Scott!
I find this really exciting, and/but, I honestly thought five years ago, that this is where we'd be today in Texas. While we're still debating the virtues of learning with these digital tools and global access to information, the world is transforming around us. It just makes me renew my resolve to do innovative research as to how and why this works and get that data out there so that when we go to argue for technology-based innovative learning, we have some data to support it!
Did you guys see this call for participation in a web discussion about using blogs in research?
On this week's webcast, Paul, Susan, Lee, Troy... and others plan to join in a conversation about students doing research online. Paul would like to make a case for blogging a a form of research. Susan has done work with her students on accessing the invisible web. Lee has collected interesting student samples to demonstrate Interactive Notetaking. Troy will bring his questions about how and why we cite sources from the web, and he is interested to hear from teachers about why they do or do not use webquests.
Please join us with your thoughts about students researching online. What are your stories?
We also want to talk about how to help students who will be ending their classes with us in January can find some closure with their blogs without closing off the possiblities of keeping an ongoing blog.
Join us in the text chat room at EdTechTalk.com on Wednesday at 9:00 p.m. Eastern... and we'll redirect you to a conference room where all can join. See you tomorrow!
Jeannine
At 1/03/2007 10:42 AM, Anonymous said…
Mr. Floyd,
Great article. The CNN article does make one wonder why we are doing some of the things we are doing in computer labs - teaching spreadsheets, powerpoint, word processing and such. With the advancement of the tools that are available, we really need to reexamine what we are doing in schools. This may mean that our expectations for products will have to change to reflect the use of the web2.0 tools. Having said that, we may also need to be ensure that such things as writing in some format, do not get lost in the waves of change.
Thanks for dropping by my blog - appreciate the comments and I'll keep checking in to see how things are going in Texas.
Kelly
At 1/03/2007 12:05 PM, Scott S. Floyd said…
Now is the time to get fired up, Jeannine. Talk to your new state rep before she leaves for Austin. Tell her to fully support the Long Range Plan for Technology that TEA is submitting along with full funding. It will work toward 1 to 1, state-wide high speed networks, MORE REAL professional development in tech use among teachers and students, portfolio requirements to prove tech proficiency on the part of students prior to leaving 8th grade and ALL teachers to prove tech proficiency according to their certification guidelines.
It is an expensive bill, but we have had so many cuts to technology in Texas education that it is time they at least try to catch back up.
I encourage you to download the Long Range Plan in its entirety and read it. They did a great job of presenting where shortfalls came after cuts in funding by the legislature.
I also encourage you to attend the TCEA state convention the first week of February in Austin. They will be having an educational technology symposium that you would be interested in.
Post a Comment
<< Home