SI 06 Lit Reviews as examples
Look at the blogs of SI 06 for more detailed examples of previous SI participant Lit Reviews:
Barbara 06
Catherine 06
Stacy 06
Teresa 06
Joyce :)
RefWorks is a web-based bibliography and database manager that allows users to create their own personal database by importing references from text files or online databases. These references can be used in writing bibliographies for papers and to automatically format the paper and the bibliography in seconds. Various writing styles are accommodated.
For help with RefWorks, see UT Arlington Help Desk RefWorks Support, the RefWorks tutorial or Quick Start Guide (in PDF).
The RefWorks Write-N-Cite module requires the UT Arlington Group Code -- login with your UT Arlington NetID to obtain the Group Code. For help with your NetID, contact the UT Arlington Help Desk at helpdesk@uta.edu or (817) 272-2208.
RefWorks is available to current UT Arlington students, faculty, and staff only. Use RefWorks.
Score | |||
| Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 2000:1 | ||
This paper presents a case study of an online block of four courses leading to certification of secondary teachers who are presently teaching in middle and secondary schools on an emergency certificate. The courses were taken by sixteen post-baccalaureate students over fall semester 1998 and... View Abstract/Citation | |||
| Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 2005:1 | ||
Feedback and assessment in social constructivist web-based instruction is a key component of learning. But often web-based learning, which is sometimes characterized by large class sizes, does not lend itself to the personal feedback, the dialogue, and the collaborative assessment that one would... View Abstract/Citation | |||
| Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 2003:1 | ||
TThe question whether digital portfolios can be used by students to span the divide between (1) theory, practice, and reflection within teacher education course work and (2) national, state professional development standards led to the development of this research case study. The study uses... View Abstract/Citation | |||
| Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 1999:1 | ||
This paper is a mid-project report of a study being conducted of a block of education methods courses for post-baccalaureate students teaching on emergency certification. Qualitative analysis techniques were applied to field notes, transcripts of computer-mediated discourse, project... View Abstract/Citation | |||
| Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 2004:1 | ||
View Abstract/Citation | |||
| Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 2000:1 | ||
The purpose of this article is to present a model for integration of technology into teacher preparation. A four-course block of elementary teacher certification courses serves as the context for this study, as well as a university-based summer camp for the requisite field experience component... View Abstract/Citation | |||
| Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 2000:1 | ||
The Infosphere represents a global resource that can be applied to the teaching/learning environment and utilizes the computer as a mediator of communication. How can such resources be incorporated into the classroom? What are the effects of computer-mediated communication on the teaching and... View Abstract/Citation | |||
| Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 1999:1 | ||
View Abstract/Citation | |||
| Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 1999:1 | ||
This paper is a report on the findings of a study conducted during an undergraduate computer science class for preservice teacher educators which was restructured using constructivist principles. Qualitative analysis techniques were applied to field-notes, transcripts of computer-mediated... View Abstract/Citation | |||
| Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE) 2002:1 | ||
Studies on the pedagogical implications for integration of technology within teacher preparation courses are emerging in a time when national surveys (Milliken 2000, ISTE 1999) decry the lack of adequate teacher preparation in this area. This study examines the pedagogical implications for the use... View Abstract/Citation | |||
| World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA) 2000:1 | ||
In a time when modern culture is linked by telecommunications technologies in ways never before possible, people transmit and process information, conduct business, collaborate in research, and engage in social and political discourse in dramatic new ways (Kapor, 1998, Wriston, 1996). Amidst... View Abstract/Citation | |||
| World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA) 2002:1 | ||
The New Four R's: Reading, Writing, Arithmetic and the Internet-Teaching Teachers to develop Web-Based Units of Instruction is a case study examining an online secondary methods of instruction course which requires students to develop web-based unit plans. The authors posit that in order for... View Abstract/Citation |
RefWorks is a web-based bibliography and database manager that allows users to create their own personal database by importing references from text files or online databases. These references can be used in writing bibliographies for papers and to automatically format the paper and the bibliography in seconds. Various writing styles are accommodated.
For help with RefWorks, see UT Arlington Help Desk RefWorks Support, the RefWorks tutorial or Quick Start Guide (in PDF).
The RefWorks Write-N-Cite module requires the UT Arlington Group Code -- login with your UT Arlington NetID to obtain the Group Code. For help with your NetID, contact the UT Arlington Help Desk at helpdesk@uta.edu or (817) 272-2208.
RefWorks is available to current UT Arlington students, faculty, and staff only. Use RefWorks.
OR recommendation by Janelle tryFURL IT! http://www.furl.net/
You are invited to a
Luncheon and
Special Multimedia Presentation
To the Faculty of the
By the Bluebonnet Writing Project
UTA Planetarium
Top Floor
Planetarium Drive
11:00 AM -12:30 PM
Wednesday
July 25, 2007
Please RSVP: jhirtle@uta.edu by Tuesday
July 24th at 5:00 PM
Lens 1: Describing affect for teachers and learners. This lens puts the spotlight on those often seemingly invisible cues that give students important information. Does the teacher respect us as learners? Does the teacher care about what she is teaching? Does the teacher work to involve us in the learning?
While these are questions that students in any classroom could legitimately ask, the “us” here consists of the teacher audience that participates and responds to the demonstration.
Said Janet Swenson, “Since this first lens invites participants to consider their affective responses, teachers generally have little difficulty beginning their letter. The opening sentences often celebrate some aspect of the demonstration and then name the affect or feelings the demonstration evoked from them.”
Lens 2: Articulating best practice. Letter writers consider what “best practices” they see in the teaching demonstration.
Sample Practices from: Best Practices in Writing http://homepages.wmich.edu/~jbush/bp/
Student Ownership and Responsibility
Supporting Students as they Draft and Revise
Grammar and Mechanics in Context
A Classroom of Shared Learning
Lens 3: The
From: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/teks/110toc.htm
· §110.2. English Language Arts and Reading, Kindergarten.
· §110.3. English Language Arts and Reading, Grade 1.
· §110.4. English Language Arts and Reading, Grade 2.
· §110.5. English Language Arts and Reading, Grade 3.
· §110.6. English Language Arts and Reading, Grade 4.
· §110.7. English Language Arts and Reading, Grade 5.
· §110.22. English Language Arts and Reading, Grade 6.
· §110.23. English Language Arts and Reading, Grade 7.
· §110.24. English Language Arts and Reading, Grade 8.
· §110.25. English Language Arts and Reading, Reading (Elective Credit).
· §110.26. English Language Arts and Reading, Speech (Elective Credit).
· §110.42. English I (One Credit).
· §110.43. English II (One Credit).
· §110.44. English III (One Credit).
· §110.45. English IV (One Credit).
Lens 4: Extensions and adaptations. Consider ways you and others can put the demonstration to use. Show how an idea from a demonstration can be represented in many ways, applied to many skills, and adapted to different grade levels.
Lens 5: Questions arisen. Ask questions about the demonstration, referencing your own teaching practice. (The primary purpose of this section is to ‘say back’ to the presenter how your or your group as a whole internalized and theorized the demonstration so the presenter might think through again all parts of the demonstration
Writing the Letter
Now, starting your letter writing to the teacher demonstrator; group members usually begin by sharing oral observations and reactions to the presentation. After that, each group finds a process that works for them in drafting the letter. Some work through the “lenses” one at a time; others find a theme in the demonstration and construct their comments around that theme. Of course, as each group will be going through this process several times, the groups have many chances to polish and tweak their response strategies. And as the group coalesces, members find their individual strengths. One person usually takes on the writing, another has a knack for coming up with a succinct expression, and still another has an advanced understanding of content areas.
Yesterday (18 July 2007), I was fortunate to sit on the Webcast of Teachers Teaching Teachers. We were able to talk to an incoming Freshman named Victoria (participant in Youth Bridges) and an Australian Senior named Danielle. You know, we all know how honest kids can be. Well, it was great to hear the perspecitives of these two articulate young women.
In many ways, what they said clearly supported the Compelling Communications theme of the day. Victoria shared with us how much she enjoyed being able to use Web 2.0 apps and that these served for jumping points to further discussions and connections with peers. She admitted to spending more time and putting forth more effort in her class where these apps were used because she realized that her connections and communications with these peers were contigent upon them. That was powerful for me.
Conversely, although Danielle loved the creation of Comic Life projects, the assignment to create a metaphor based on two texts did not hook her. She wondered when she would use that skill. She was not enthused because the assignment did not mean anything to her. She did, however, admit that she would much rather be doing the Comic Life project than writing an essay. She raised a good pondering. She wondered if she was missing something from not writing the essay? Have we or has our educational system trained our students so well that they, too, are under the impression that writing an essay will equip them with everything they need for a job in the real world?
The discussion continued. This is where it got good. Both students began to complain about teachers. "Why don't they know how to do that? Is it MY job to teach them? Why doesn't everyone teach the way I was taught last year?" These were some of the challenges we heard. They also feared that teachers were resistant to learning these tools, and even more alarming, many would not accept or invite help from students because it would show that they did not, in fact, mean everything. (Insert sarcastic gasp here).
So I was left with this: Compelling Communication does not only need to be reflected in the work we ask our students to do. We need to also engage in these types of meaningful interactions WITH our students. Maybe, there should be a Students Teaching Teachers?
Powered by ScribeFire.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Powered by ScribeFire.
I spoke with Continuing Education; we can get 8 hours of CEU’s for your students technology (PowerPoint) units. The cost will be $5 each. Will you discuss with your class and I can get names and money to have Certificates printed out. Let me know if this is what they would like to do. Also: http://txbwp.edublogs.org
Publish PostPowered by ScribeFire.
Haiku Log for July 18, 2007
Lourdes finds herself
Inside a secret forest
Mingling with nature
Asserting itself
A shimmering dragonfly
Self-discovery
An urban grown-up
Heather, a child in the woods
Sees life with new eyes
Vines strewn in the woods
Bobcat tracks in the fresh mud
Handwriting of God
Removed from nature
Nature Deficit Disorder
An urban malaise
Mel, an awesome guide
Phyllis, so knowledgeable
Susie, a teacher
Newly found friendships
More natural bonding
Fun like in 3rd grade
Glistening with dew
Spider webs in the sunlight
No manicured lawns
River Legacy
Might help us raise our TAKS scores
Nature helps again
On this weeks Teaching Teaching Teachers webcast (#60), we were joined by four National Writing Project teachers who were selected last summer to participate in Tech Matters — a 4-day summer institute sponsored by the Tech Liaison Network of the National Writing Project. Joe Bellino, Bonnie Kaplan, Kevin Hodgson, and Donna Bragg discussed moments they remember from Tech Matters`06, and they talked about five issues they faced after they returned from Tech Matters. These teachers talked about learning to turn these separate challenges into strands of a web of support for change in their teaching and in their local Writing Projects:
Thats an outline of what these teachers learned last summer. What did you learn last summer? Did it make a difference in your classroom? How are you learning this summer? Join us to share one of your memories about summer learning.
For example, here is a part of Cynthia Calvert's story:
Being at TM 06 was one of the best things that ever happened to me both professionally and personally. If I had not been invited to TM06, I would not have met Jason, Tracey, and Paige–my fellow Common Threads collaborators and my life would not have been as full. I now count them among my closest and dearest friends. Then I wouldn't have met Kevin who inspires me to take risks and try new technology tools that until TM06 I did not know existed. I could go on about each and every person who was involved in TM06. I am a better person and a better TL for having been a part of the institute. I know this sounds corny, but it's true. Finally, I have a better handle on what my job as Alcorn WP's TL is. I have more confidence and speak with more authority when I talk about technology. I've learned to take baby steps, thanks to Peter and Betty, and not try to do everything at once, so I'm less overwhelmed.
Tech Matters`07 starts within hours. We have already invited all former TM participants to join the Technology Matters website (a DrupalEd site that Bill Fitzgerald and Will Banks have been helping us to build). If you were a Tech Matters participant in `03, `04,`05, or `06, and we missed you. Please register on our site now: http://nwptechmatters07.org/user/register
We would also like to invite anybody who is reading this now to subscribe to the work of Tech Matters`07. We want you to hear the podcasts, see the videos and pictures, and read the texts published by this years invited participants of Technology Matters.
Subscribe to Technology Matters in a reader (and receive all text, audio, and video that is made public.)
Add Technology Matters Podcast (audio only) to your iTunes
Subscribe to Technology Matters Videocast (video only).
Finally we want to invite you to join us live on webcasts that we will be streaming from Chico, California through the help of Susan Ettenheim, Jeff Lebow, Dave Cormier and others connected with http://edtechtalk.com. Here are the times when we want you to join us. All you need is Skype, a microphone, and a headset of ear buds to join us on any of these afternoons:
Please join us at http://edtechtalk.com. Help us to widen the conversations we are having at Technology Matters `07.
If you do not see your name, or something needs to be changed, please let Joyce know as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Jeannine, Janelle and Joyce :)
I am working on setting up a new school blog to go with my new job. I will post it here in early August. Maybe I can be your Wes Fryer.
As for what I read, look here:
WOScholar's Bloglines Blogroll
There are 105 feeds right now. Let me know what you think. There are administrators, teachers, education specialists, and even the political links. WARNING: The political blog list has some bloggers that sometimes use foul language. I keep them on my list because they provide valuable insight while Austin is in session. And the way they use voice to write posts is just amazing. Those folks have some writing talent (and sarcasm). While I do not agree with their views on everything, they do offer a different perspective I need to consider at times.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Mozartians, Beethovians, and the Teaching of Writing
By Diane Christian Boehm
In this essay from 1993, Diane Christian Boehm directly confronts the myth of the sequential writing process, finding that writers create as "Mozartians" or "Beethovians," or sometimes a little of both.
Skeletons Out of the Closet: The Case of the Missing 162%
By Bob Pressnall
A Quarterly article often reveals a teacher’s mind at work, providing readers a ringside seat as the teacher observes, changes, rearranges, and fine-tunes classroom practice.
Getting Real: Authenticity in Writing Prompts
By Patricia Slagle
Writing teachers often strive to develop exercises so that students will write "authentic" pieces for an audience beyond the teacher, but in this 1997 article, Patricia Slagle demonstrates the next step: sending student writing to people outside the classroom.
The Parallel Universes of Theory and Practice: One Teacher's Journey
By Beverly Paesano
Beverly Paesano began her teaching career frustrated that the traditional approaches she'd been taught “did not help children write more fluently and look at [their] writing more critically."
The Only New Thing Under the Sun: 25 Years of the National Writing Project
By Sheridan Blau
In this 1999 article—originally delivered as an address at the 25th anniversary celebration of the California Writing Project—Sheridan Blau recounts the core idea of writing project founder Jim Gray that the most reliable and credible solutions to the problems of learning and teaching are to be found in the wisdom and knowledge possessed by experienced and successful classroom teachers.
Tolerating Intolerance: Resisting the Urge to Silence Student Opinion in the Writing Classroom
By Sarah Rider
As Sarah Rider butts up against the white supremacist views of one her students, she comes to understand that “the value of diverse opinions in the classroom should not be restricted only to those that please the instructor."
Theory, Politics, Hope and Action
By Carole Edelsky
In recent years, with the influx into American schools of many thousands of students learning English, the National Writing Project and The Quarterly have given increasing attention to the concerns of these learners and their teachers.
Critical Incident: Narrative (writing/revising now)
Becoming Your Own Expert—Teachers as Writers
By Tim Gillespie
In this 1985 piece, Tim Gillespie argues that teachers need to write so that their teaching of writing can be “based on knowledge we have earned ourselves."
"Whose Writing is it Anyway"? Kids Love To Write...Don't Wait Until They Read
By Diane Borgman
In this article from 1986, Diane Borgman describes the joy of working with kindergarten writers entirely unburdened by the bogeyman of first-draft correctness.
Computers and English: Future Tense...Future Perfect?
By Stephen Marcus
In 1990, Marcus made some predictions about what might happen with technology in the classroom during the next 15 years—prophecies that are interesting to examine in hindsight.